With academia increasingly adopting AIGC (AI-generated content) detection systems, reducing “AI-generated content rates” has become a critical concern in academic writing. According to 2024 statistics from medical journals, approximately 5.6% of submissions are rejected each month due to excessively high proportions of AI-generated content.
Some authors alternate between ChatGPT and Claude to generate different sections, hoping to reduce textual consistency. Others turn to AI content obfuscators in an attempt to bypass detection and avoid accusations of AI plagiarism. But are these methods truly effective? What is the recommended best approach?
Beyond the commonly-known tool Turnitin, MIT has developed a “writing style fingerprinting” technique that can trace the unique output patterns of different AI models.
These systems analyze indicators such as average sentence length, vocabulary diversity, and textual predictability. AI-generated content often features repetitive sentence structures and overly rigid logic.
Leading AI writing detection tools like Turnitin and Originality.ai use a confidence-level grading system, flagging potentially AI-generated passages without directly labeling them as plagiarism.
However, these tools are not flawless. Although many AI writing detection systems claim false positive rates below 1%, real-world use suggests that misclassification happens more frequently. Common causes of false positives include grammar checkers, translation software and even advanced editing tools. In some cases, even a writer’s consistent personal style may be mistakenly flagged as AI-generated content!
Try and rewrite in a more conversational tone. Avoid overly formal or rigid sentences; instead, use the kind of language you would naturally use when speaking. Incorporate everyday expressions to make the writing sound more authentic.
Remove repetitive, mechanical transition words (e.g., “Moreover”) and replace them with more natural alternatives like “But” or “Interestingly.”
Include reflections on your own research process within theoretical sections, adding personal insights and viewpoints.
Break up long, complex sentences into 2–3 shorter ones to increase variability in sentence structure.
Add a concluding paragraph on “Research Limitations and Reflections” to enhance originality.
While many online tools claim to reduce AI writing detection rates, our testing shows that most are misleading or simply generate meaningless content to trick the system.
These tools typically offer free AI detection checks while promoting their paid rewriting services. You might see improved scores in their system, but results from Turnitin, Originality.ai, or other credible platforms often remain unchanged.
Many of these tools are built on English-based algorithms and rely heavily on machine translation for marketing. We generally do not recommend using these tools.
Professional editing services bring deep subject knowledge and language expertise to the table, allowing experienced editors to reinterpret and revise content with full understanding of the research context.
By clarifying the logical flow and core argumentative structure, editors can revise flagged sections into more nuanced academic discourse.
For instance, standardized data descriptions can be transformed into interpretative narratives that reflect conversations within the academic community. Editors may also embed the researcher’s unique reasoning process into key arguments.
This human-centered rewriting approach reduces the likelihood of detection by algorithms sensitive to formulaic writing, while preserving both academic rigor and the authenticity of the researcher’s voice.
We offer professional academic editing services in both English and Chinese.
AsiaEdit specializes in high-quality translation and copyediting of academic documents, and has long partnered with top universities across Asia and beyond. Our expertise covers journal papers, grant proposals, academic reports, and more. In response to recent challenges around AI-generated content, we now provide tailored editing and translation solutions to address these concerns.
Your work will be handled by native-speaking, post-graduate editors who will ensure the language is natural and fluent. Depending on your needs, we can either make light revisions to retain your original tone or provide comprehensive rewriting to minimize AI writing detection issues.
While AI is a helpful tool, relying too heavily on it reduces originality. Make sure your paper reflects your own thinking and analysis, not just AI-generated output.
AI can assist in locating relevant academic sources and data, but you should read, understand, and rephrase the information in your own words to ensure accuracy and academic integrity.
Copying and pasting AI-generated content directly can raise the AIGC (AI-generated content) score and compromise the paper’s independence. Always rewrite and integrate AI-provided insights into your own writing style. Or pay a service to do this for you if possible.
If you’re struggling during the writing process, feel free to ask AI for ideas or guidance. However, the final content should be your own to preserve originality.
AI tools are useful for grammar and spell checks, but it’s your responsibility to verify the paper’s logical flow and coherence. A clear structure and sound argumentation are essential for academic work.
AI can help identify relevant references, but it’s important to cite them correctly and include all sources in your paper to meet academic standards.
After writing, use AI-detection tools to check the AIGC rate. This will help ensure your paper meets academic expectations and avoid potential misconduct.
Evolving AI Citation Standards in International Guidelines
The Modern Language Association (MLA) provides specific guidelines for citing AI-generated content to promote transparency and traceability. According to the MLA Style Center, when incorporating material produced by AI tools like ChatGPT, authors should include a description of the prompt or content, the name of the tool (italicized), the version (if known), the developer or publisher, the date of content generation, and a stable URL. (source)
An example citation would be:
“Analyzing Imagery in Yeats’ Poetry” prompt. ChatGPT, 13 Feb. version, OpenAI, 12 Mar. 2025, chat.openai.com/chat.
In contrast, the American Psychological Association (APA) recommends that AI-generated content be cited as the output of an algorithm. The author of the content should be the company that created the AI tool. For instance, when citing ChatGPT, OpenAI would be listed as the author. The citation should include the prompt used, the date, and a URL if available. (source)
Key Ethical Concerns in Academic Writing
Legal Risks and Infringement Cases
With structural adjustments and the help of professional tools or editors, it is possible to reduce AI writing detection rates from over 80% to below 15%. The key lies in maintaining a human narrative thread—using AI as a resource, not a replacement—and building a distinctive, personalized writing style.
Several universities have begun scanning for AI-generated content and signs of AI plagiarism. If your paper is flagged as AI-written, it could be deemed academically dishonest.
AI is great for assisting in outlining or planning your paper, but the actual content and citations should be written by you. This is especially important for references, as Turnitin and similar tools are strict in verifying source accuracy and originality.
Your Schedule, Our Prime Concern AsiaEdit takes a personalised approach to editing.
We are East Asia's leading academic editing partner. Established in 1996 and headquartered in Hong Kong, we have strong connections with academics and renowned faculty in the region, built by delivering quality work on schedule for more than 25 years.
Suite 2101, 99 Hennessy Road,
Wan Chai, Hong Kong
9:00am – 6:00pm
(+852) 2590 6588
Post your Reply